Brian J. McManus & Associates, LTD

Brian J. McManus & Associates, LTD

Small law firm in downtown Chicago

(312) 346-8210

Demanding Justice and
Protecting Your Rights

  • Mission
  • Practice Areas
    • Construction Negligence
    • Dog Bites
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Motor Vehicle Accidents
    • Personal Injury
    • Premises Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Wrongful Death
  • Attorneys
    • Brian J. McManus, Sr.
    • Brian McManus, Jr.
    • Michael N. Folga
    • Fred W. Ellison, Jr.
  • Results
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Español

Common Defenses in Premises Liability Cases

June 24, 2022 McManus

If someone is injured on another’s property due to some hazardous condition or defect, that person may have a premises liability case against the landowner or some other person or entity responsible for the maintenance of the property.

Nevertheless, common defenses that a landowner may assert are that the hazard was open and obvious, the victim was partially negligent themselves (contributory negligence), and the victim assumed the risk.

Open and obvious

In this defense, the landowner contends that the defect was so apparent that anyone would have seen it as it was open and obvious. For example, if bright blue detergent were spilled on a bright white grocery store floor and a victim slipped and fell because of the detergent the grocery store would allege that the detergent puddle was open and obvious to the victim and they should have seen it to have prevented their fall.

Contributory negligence

Contributory negligence is another common defense that also accuses the injured party of contributing in part to their own injury.

In Illinois, there is what is known as a modified comparative fault system which falls under the general category of contributory negligence. Under this comparative fault system, if the injured party is over 50% at fault, then they are not entitled to any type of a monetary recovery. If the injured party is less than 50% at fault, then they may recover monetary damages.

As an example, if a jury found a car accident victim (Plaintiff) had braked too hard when they were rear-ended and that they therefore were 51% at fault, then the Plaintiff would receive $0.00 in monetary damages. However, if the jury only found the Plaintiff to be 40% at fault and they awarded $100,000.00 in damages, then the Plaintiff is entitled to receive $60,000.00 from that award.

Assumption of risk

Under the assumption of risk defense, there are three theories which can be asserted. The three theories are known as primary assumption of risk, implied assumption of risk and secondary assumption of risk. Under any of these theories, the plaintiff knows of the risk and voluntarily agrees to take that risk.

For example, if a plaintiff carpenter cuts their hand while using a table saw while they were tasked with building a home, the defense can argue that the plaintiff knew of the inherent risk of using a table saw and nonetheless assumed that risk. Another example is if the plaintiff was a roofer and was required to take additional safety precautions, but did not do so, then the defendant may assert that the plaintiff assumed the risk of being on the roof, by their failing to utilize the additional safety precautions. In this case, the defendant may use this failure to act safely as a way to mitigate the plaintiff’s ability to recover damages.

Premises Liability, Slip & Fall

Contact Us

Brian J. McManus & Associates, LTD.
33 North LaSalle St., Suite 1210
Chicago, IL. 60602

(312) 346-8210 phone
(877) 346-8211 toll-free
(312) 346-8565 fax

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Recent Posts

  • Premises Liability Cases and Liens
  • When Should I Retain an Attorney if I am Injured by Another’s Negligence?
  • Common Defenses in Premises Liability Cases
  • Evidence and Discovery in Premises Liability Cases
  • Premises Liability: Statute of Limitations, Responsible Parties and Strategy

Contact Us

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

©2023 Brian J. McManus & Associates, LTD. All Rights Reserved.

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Please give us your feedback!